Jeffrey Combs
By Michelle Erica GreenPosted at March 25, 2002 - 9:06 PM GMT
See Also: 'Acquisition' Episode Guide
Jeffrey Combs, who plays mysterious Andorian Shran on Enterprise, returns to the series this week as another character, Krem -- one of the first group of Ferengi ever encountered by humans. Combs is known to Trek fans as Deep Space Nine's Weyoun, the Vorta mouthpiece of the Dominion, and Brunt, the greedy Ferengi who wants to chop Quark into pieces. He also played fight promoter Penk on Voyager's 'Tsunkatse' and appeared in DS9's 'Meridian.'
During a career that includes nearly a hundred theatrical appearances and dozens of films, he has played H.P. Lovecraft and Montgomery Clift. But for many genre fans, Combs will always be remembered as Herbert West from the classic cult film Re-Animator. He talks to Trek Nation about his new Enterprise characters, working with Scott Bakula, twisted Vulcan logic and the horror movie that won't let him go.
Trek Nation: Welcome back to Star Trek. It seems like once you're in
with this group, you're in -- I see that Ethan Phillips is doing the Ferengi
episode, and Rene Auberjonois will be appearing too.
Jeffrey Combs: I saw Rene a couple of weeks ago. I was finishing up
my episode and he was showing up for a costume fitting for the next episode.
I came back from a rehearsal and Rene was standing there saying, 'Is that
the way you're going to do that? You're not going to do it that way, are
you?'
I love Rene. I wouldn't be here without Rene. I guest-starred in my first
Deep Space Nine, an episode called 'Meridian' directed by Jonathan
Frakes, and because of that I got to reacquaint with Rene -- I had done
theater with him at the Mark Taper Forum some years before. We reconnected,
and about a month later, he was directing his first episode, which was a
Ferengi episode, 'Family Business.' He suggested me for the role of Brunt.
Trek Nation: Now you're Andorian as well as Ferengi. What's the
Enterprise set like for you, after having been on the other shows,
where you must have had a lot of friends?
Combs: The camaraderie is great. Morale is really high, in large part
due to Scott. He's just a leader -- he is the captain, and a great
pace-setter. He's very engaging, he approaches everybody, he's friends with
everybody, a great wit, and expects in a quiet and strong way that that's
the way the set should go. It's a good place to work, a fun-but-serious
place, 'Let's get the work done but let's have fun doing it.' It's a great
place to go in large part because of him. He sets a tone that is phenomenal
and no one wants to disrupt that. He's like the quarterback and everybody
wants to do their best, including me.
Trek Nation: Is it a lot of the casting people and crew you knew from
DS9 and Voyager?
Combs: The casting people, yes. The director of photography is the
same, a lot of the directors are the same. There are a number of familiar
faces. It's the same wardrobe people, makeup people -- maybe on the earlier
shows they didn't have as much responsibility, some moved up and some moved
on.
So it's the same, but different -- kind of like a parallel universe.
Enterprise is on three soundstages, two where Voyager was and
one where a lot of Deep Space Nine was, so the bridge and the torpedo room,
the launch bays and all that -- that's all on a soundstage that a lot of
Deep Space Nine was done on. So it's sort of weird. I walk on and
think, 'I've probably stood right in this exact spot and been Weyoun.'
Trek Nation: Shran reminded me a bit in the first episode of Weyoun,
because he was going to get the information through torture if he had to,
but he could stay above it and smile about it.
Combs: In the first one? I don't remember smiling very much. I
remember being determined and pissed and ruthless. The ruthless part is
certainly the same, but Weyoun would circle his prey. These guys are much
more visceral and hands-on than Weyoun.
Trek Nation: Are you playing him as paranoid, or as completely
straightforward -- this is what he believes not because he's paranoid, but
because he knows the truth? When he first says he had to come rescue Archer
because he couldn't sleep at night, it sounds sort of neurotic, but we know
so little about Andorian culture that it may not be neurotic to them.
Combs: That was a hard line. I couldn't sleep at night? He doesn't
sleep any night, probably, because he's got his finger on the trigger. I
just took it as a metaphor about my overall angst about owing anybody
anything. Really it's because he just doesn't want to be in anyone's back
pocket or have anyone need him, from a political point of view; he wants his
slate clean so he's free to do what he wants.
That was sort of the way I approached it.
It's like saying I had bad dreams and I want to get a good night's sleep. I
think that I have the data on the Vulcans; I know for sure what they're
doing. There's no paranoia in there.
Trek Nation: Do you have any sense of how high up Shran is in the
Andorian hierarchy?
Combs: No, I don't. I don't know how uniform and organized their
resistance is. They have some pretty good technology -- they have
communicators and pretty good weapons, and they can get around. They have a
pretty good spy network. But how far up he is, I don't know. Give me some
medals! He's probably kind of a free radical, just kind of roams around.
Trek Nation: 'Hey, you blew up P'Jem, now go deal with Coridan.'
Combs: That was another thing I thought was interesting. The captain
is taking our side in the argument, saying you know, if the Vulcans were in
the position of the Andorians, they'd do the same thing. He told the
Vulcans, you did have a center there that you didn't say that you had. You
basically lied to us about the reality of the situation, so you can't come
to us and be all haughty about it when you were caught with your pants down!
We Andorians can maybe trust these humans because they did the right thing
by us even though we beat them up and interrogated them. In the end they
know right from wrong. Which to me is the kernel of the Andorians' issues --
what's fair, what's right, not just who's strongest, though that could
easily turn, too. There's no reason they can't be the bad guys at some
point.
Trek Nation: Might they become villains? Did the producers talk to
you about whether your character would be recurring?
Combs: No, that would be conveying too much information! They were
very effusive the first time. Brannon came down to my trailer and said that
this was going to be the best show, so they were very enthusiastic. But they
never said you'll be back, definitely. I don't really know what their
philosophy is on this show about ongoing storylines. I don't know whether
we're going to be recurring villains or what.
Trek Nation: The Andorian we know best from Star Trek is the
one who wasn't really -- the disguised Orion from the original series. And
then there were throwaway lines on Next Gen, I think that was where
we found out they get married in groups of four. Did they tell you anything
more than what little we know?
Combs: No. I watched 'Journey To Babel' -- again, because I had seen
it a long time ago -- but I think they want to start a clean slate. They
didn't hand me a bible or anything. They didn't say, 'Remember this.' The
makeup isn't the same, and even the whole commando idea -- in 'Journey to
Babel,' they're more diplomats.
Trek Nation: So far it seems this show has set the Vulcans up as the
biggest villains -- bigger than the Klingons.
Combs: I know, and I think that's great. Remember how Scotty was sort
of anti-Spock? Here's the reason why. It's not just bigotry -- there's
probably a personal and historical justification for it. These guys keep
laying it in, every show, 'You kept secrets from my father, you didn't give
us the antidote for something when you could have, you didn't give us the
technology, you told us one thing when it's another, P'Jem was just a
sanctuary when in reality it's a surveillance center of huge proportions.'
Trek Nation: And now Shran says the Vulcans are massing a fleet.
Combs: We know that they're waging a war against us. We know it! When
I see those lines, I go, okay, isn't that interesting! I love the
Vulcans' use of logic -- that logic can be tortured to attain them the
things they really want. You can use logic to justify your territorial needs
or your strategic needs. It's a very curious sort of examination of the
Vulcans. I think that's one of the strongest notes that they've brought up,
an ingenious note. All these aliens are manifestations of humans, in one
extreme or another, so you can delude yourself even with logic.
Trek Nation: I read that you had said you thought Enterprise
was closest in style to the original series.
Combs: Not in style, so much -- in structure. It's a single ship out
there exploring the universe; it has a lot more action than the others,
which tended to fall into a lot of walking-and-talking stuff, whereas you're
guaranteed some things going on physically in this show. A strong captain
who is instinctive...in that way it's very similar to the original series.
The simplicity of the form is like the original. To seek out strange new
worlds...to go where no man has gone before. I don't even think Next
Generation did that quite so on the nose. I always found Next Gen
kind of cold. And with Voyager, you're lost and you want to get
home -- there's no stronger premise than that, that's The Odyssey --
yet every time I watched that show I never got a sense that they were doing
anything to get home. Where were the moral conflicts, the sacrifices to be
made, decisions that had to be stuck to, or temptations that pulled you away
from the central motivation? Enterprise has the human dynamic. It's
Captain Archer deciding how to do the right thing.
Trek Nation: It looks like you're part of a core group of Andorians.
Combs: Two, at least. My cohort in the first episode, who liked
T'Pol, was in this one too. It will be interesting to see if we're both
back, though they're free to introduce other Andorians too. Remember, with
Weyoun, Weyoun started as a guy who oversaw a little troupe of Jem'Hadar,
making sure they got their Ketracel-White. Then he evolved into overseeing
the entire Dominion War.
Trek Nation: Although they kept having to bump off his defective
clones. At least on that show, you knew that having your character die was
of no consequence.
Combs: When I first was killed, in my very first episode, I thought,
'That's that.' But they went, 'Wait a minute, we like this dynamic,' so they
found a way to bring me back. One of the first questions I asked with Shran
was, 'Does he die? He doesn't die, does he?'
Trek Nation: 'And if he does, does he have an identical twin
brother?' But you're playing a Ferengi, too. Do you survive 'Acquisition'?
Combs: Yes! Ferengi never get killed. They're too lusciously cunning,
like animals. They're selfish and clever but they can be put back in their
place. The Ferengi were originally supposed to be intimidating, not comical;
that lasted about thirty seconds. In their nature they're humorous because
they're so one-track. But they can be very different from one another. Ethan
Phillips is doing one in this episode and we're very different.
Trek Nation: Of your Ferengi characters, who's meaner, Brunt or Krem?
Combs: I'm a much nicer guy this time. This is a Ferengi caught in a
situation he doesn't want to be caught in. He's the innocent. I appreciated
that they gave me that -- I think originally they thought of me doing the
Ferengi version of Shran.
Trek Nation: Playing a Ferengi before must have helped you with this
character.
Combs: Actually not. I was scared -- I'm in this makeup and my sense
memory tells me it's Brunt makeup, but it's not. So I had to shed away
everything ingrained in me about how I would react, because I'm not Brunt.
Trek Nation: Have you ever asked about playing a Starfleet officer --
a human?
Combs: When you play all these villains, it's hard for the producers
to think of you as one of the crew. I'm the utility player at the end of the
bench, tarring my bat, and every once in awhile they say, 'Combs, get in
there and hit one.'
Trek Nation: Who's the hardest makeup job?
Combs: That's a hard one. I like the Ferengi least of all just
because it's the least comfortable. It closes off your world, you can't hear
very well, and as the day accumulates, it starts really doing a number. The
Andorians are fairly comfortable...although the first day was not, because
we were still getting the kinks out of the contraption that works the
antennae underneath the wig and forehead piece.
Trek Nation: Do you control those?
Combs: No, there's a battery-pack transmitter on the back of my belt,
and there's a puppeteer who operates the controls off-camera. He watches
rehearsals and talks to me about when we need them. I try not to think about
them. That's his world -- I hear them clicking and whirring every once in
awhile, but not when the camera's rolling. I get tunnel vision and I don't
hear.
Trek Nation: Did you see The Tick? He has the world's most
expressive antennae.
Combs: I did see a little, when I was getting out of my blue makeup
one night. In the makeup trailer they had it on TV and I'm going, wait a
second! Blue is everywhere! I wonder if it's the same technology.
Trek Nation: I'm sure you get asked about the makeup at conventions.
What are the questions you get asked most often?
Combs: 'What's the makeup like? How long does the makeup take? How do
you remember those lines?' The interesting one, I always find, is, 'Do you
like working with all that makeup on?' The implication of the question is,
'Is that less than acting?' Which is a silly notion really. An actor has
tools, and special-effects makeup is just a part of that tool bag. In many
ways it's harder, because you have to find other ways to express things.
It's an extra challenge. It frees you up, though, because you're not you
anymore. You can go to the market and buy milk without being recognized. You
can do something else. I do other things.
Trek Nation: What have you been working on?
Combs: Last year I went to Luxembourg and shot a movie with Stephen
Dorff called FearDotCom, which is going to be out in theaters
sometime this year. Warner Bros. picked it up for North America and they're
going to give it a really good release. I play something totally
different -- a slovenly, lazy, dried-up, apathetic cop. Stephen Dorff is the
more caring, edgy detective still dealing with the case that got away. I'm
sort of 'Eh, who cares, can't win 'em all, you want a donut?' I'm basically
a lost-my-edge kind of cop, which is really different from anything I've
ever done before. That's what I like to do.
Trek Nation: Is this a straight thriller or supernatural?
Combs: It's sort of Seven meets What Lies Beneath. If
you log on to this web site, you end up dying of your worst fear. Sort of
that icky Seven tone, with maybe a little esoteric feel to it. So
that was good. I went to Spain and shot a movie called Faust. And I
did a little independent movie called Attic Expeditions, which
Blockbuster has picked up and will put out in their stores, which is a
twisty-turny little mind-bender movie. So I'm keeping busy.
Trek Nation: Are people still asking whether there's going to be
another Re-Animator?
Combs: Oh, I still get that. It's out on the web as if it's
happening, as if I'm attached, and at this point none of that is true. The
web is an interesting place. If one site posts something, then other sites
pick it up and perpetuate it as if it's gospel, without asking the people
involved. Beyond Re-Animator is all over the place, my name is there,
supposedly it's in pre-production, and this is the farthest thing from the
truth. There is no deal in place.
Trek Nation: Would you like there to be, or is it been-there,
done-that?
Combs: I'm ambivalent about it. Re-Animator has been very good
to me, but I don't think that you can get the genie back in the bottle. It's
very hard to make a successful sequel, and there is a little bit of
been-there, done-that.
Earlier in my career I was considered a horror actor, which kind of irked me
because that perpetuated itself for awhile. I'm an actor -- horror found me,
I didn't find it. I've gotten out of that little box, though now perhaps I'm
thought of as a sci-fi/horror actor with great potential I hope to break out
of that into much more. So if I went back and did it, it might very well not
help my cause. I have nothing against horror if it's done well, but I have
my own vision of the future too.
Trek Nation: Do you write or produce?
Combs: Write? No. That's a different part of the brain, I suspect,
that has to be engaged. Produce, if I found a project that gassed me up, I
would probably give it my all. I do a lot of reading, but how could I get
anything done if my interests lie outside of sci-fi/horror? Everyone would
say, 'The only way we could get money is if it were sci-fi/horror,' and my
interests are much more varied. I tend to read historical novels and
mysteries. Right now I'm reading The Corrections.
Trek Nation: The book that had the brouhaha because the author didn't
want to be commodified by Oprah.
Combs: Well, good for him. He probably didn't want to be lumped in
with her list. Although if you compare Oprah's list to the bestsellers...oh
my god, people would rather pick up the latest Dawn Steele? Isn't it
demoralizing? I don't get it. I look at the bestsellers and I go, 'What?
This is what people want?'
But my tastes are not mainstream. I remember in high school everyone talking
about Night of the Living Dead, and I thought, that's going to be too
creepy for me. And I didn't see it for a really long time. I had a block
about it. I imagine that that was the case with Re-Animator for a lot
of people. Everybody now remembers it as this huge cult hit, and it
certainly got incredible reactionary reviews -- if they weren't glowing, at
least they were very strong!
Trek Nation: So many movies have copied it, and it was influential on
other people making horror movies.
Combs: But it did not have a huge release when it first came out. It
had a very small theatrical release. Word of mouth was very strong. We
didn't make that product. It's grown in stature as the years have gone by.
Trek Nation: Do you still see a lot of the DS9 cast?
Combs: I'm going to see Casey Biggs' production of Richard III
tonight with Marc Alaimo. We live near each other. With Marc Alaimo and
Casey Biggs, I do a three-man show, so we see each other periodically and
travel together. We're going to be at about four conventions this year
together doing our show.
Trek Nation: Enjoy the fans! Thanks very much for this. Discuss this interviews at Trek BBS!
Add TrekToday RSS feed to your news reader or My Yahoo!
Also a Desperate Housewives fan? Then visit GetDesperate.com!
Michelle Erica Green reviews Enterprise episodes and Star Trek books for the Trek Nation, as well as Andromeda episodes for SlipstreamWeb. She has written for magazines and sites such as SFX, Cinescape and Another Universe. An archive of her work can be found at The Little Review. Her previous interview with Jeffrey Combs, in which the actor talked about his role on Voyager, can be found here at the Little Review.